Most AI plans fail before anything's built, because they're built backwards.
"What can AI do?" gets you 34 ideas, a confused team, and six months of pilots that never scale.
"Where do we lose the most money?" gets you the 2–3 that actually matter.
My job isn't to find AI uses. It's to cut hard — so your resources go where they work.
"Here's everything you could do" isn't strategy. "Here's what to do first, and why" is.
What Makes the Answer Hold Up
The most useful part of any plan isn't the list of what to build. It's the list of what not to. Chasing everything dilutes everything. I cut hard, so what's left has a real shot.
The most valuable part of any AI strategy isn't the list of what to build. It's the list of what not to.
Most organisations are already considering too many AI initiatives. Pursuing all of them dilutes focus, drains resources, and produces nothing that works at scale. The Vector Method cuts aggressively — so the initiatives that survive have a real chance.
Every number rests on assumptions, and they're easy to leave unsaid.
If a projection assumes cleaner data than you have, that belongs on the table, before you commit, not after.
The AI projects that keep stalling. The options that start to blur together. The debates that go in circles. Let's cut through it.